A recent Twitter discussion surrounding DoorDash and its necessity for those with chronic illnesses has sparked controversy on the platform. Some individuals argue that they need DoorDash because of their physical limitations, claiming that they are too depressed to open their microwaves and cook or reheat frozen meals. This viewpoint has been met with criticism from some users who believe that this rationale is not a valid reason to rely on food delivery apps.
Twitter user Jeremiah Johnson highlighted some of the most alarming comments from the discussion, including one user who argued that access to all food at all times is a basic human right and that people cannot be choosy about what they deserve. Another Twitter user, under the handle @sextoyspolitics, shared a lengthy thread stating that microwaving a frozen meal involves more steps than just putting it in the microwave, such as opening the box and understanding the instructions. This perspective has been widely ridiculed by others on the platform, with some stating that the user may need to be under supervised care if they find microwaving a meal difficult.
oh boyhttps://t.co/AcVcFPh9oU
— Jeremiah Johnson 🌐 (@JeremiahDJohns) March 22, 2024
The user who shared @sextoyspolitics' thread, Armand Domalewski, received backlash for his commentary, with some stating that he may have an undiagnosed mental illness for his excitement over a potential post-apocalyptic world. However, he has defended his stance, stating that occasional DoorDash orders are fine, but that they cannot be considered a basic fundamental human right as it relies on the labor of others.
The discussion surrounding DoorDash and its necessity for those with chronic illnesses has raised questions about the impact of food choices on overall health, both mental and physical. The debate also highlights the different perspectives on self-sufficiency and responsibility when it comes to daily tasks, such as cooking and meal preparation.
If you find microwaving a meal this difficult you genuinely need to be under some form of supervised care pic.twitter.com/GWwZ1rWhVw
— Armand Domalewski (@ArmandDoma) March 24, 2024
While some argue that relying on DoorDash is a valid option for those with chronic illnesses, others point out that there are often more cost-effective alternatives, such as grocery shopping or ordering frozen meals. These alternatives may also have a positive impact on overall health.
The conversation has also brought up the issue of privilege, with some stating that relying on food delivery services is a luxury that not everyone can afford. The high markups on food delivery apps may be out of reach for those who are food insecure or on tight budgets.
This is what someone sent me because I pointed out that someone who is so disabled they are incapable of microwaving a meal needs hands-on medical care and not DoorDash pic.twitter.com/DBvuNmVtUa
— Armand Domalewski (@ArmandDoma) March 25, 2024
In response to the criticism, some users have clarified their need for DoorDash by stating that they have underlying health issues, such as physical disabilities or mental illnesses, that make it difficult for them to cook or shop for groceries. However, the discussion raises important questions about the accountability and responsibility for one's own health and well-being.
Finally, the debate surrounding DoorDash and chronic illnesses sheds light on the societal impact of the increasing reliance on technology and convenience. While food delivery apps may provide convenience for some, it also raises concerns about the potential consequences of relying too heavily on these services. Overall, the Twitter conversation continues to spark discussions about the intersection of health, technology, and privilege.